Thread:Francesca14601/@comment-30529396-20191018201518/@comment-18086040-20191020224052

PrincessBatman wrote: Francesca14601 wrote: PrincessBatman wrote: ChibiVixie wrote: Chilew wrote: I know this probably doesn't have anything to do with what's going on here, but I have a problem. Do any of you have the book Audrey's diary because the book gives out some very important details that I think should be added, but that's actually not what my problem is about. My problem haves something to do with TV tropes. Do any of you read the Descendants character page on that website or at least go on that website at all because everything either seems to exaggerated or completely ridiculous like they didn't even watched the film or the animated series at all. They do not know anything about the characters and they certainly have no respect for Jane on that site as they don't even notice the character development she clearly had during the three films. I mean she's clearly not the same shy and insecure girl she was in the first film anymore. She may have acted mean to Mal on family day, but it wasn't like it was her fault anyways. Jane's been nothing but a close friend and ally to the VKs along with Lonnie. Do any of you have an account on that site or at least want to read the descendants character page on TV tropes to see what I mean. Sorry to bother you with this message if you don't approve of this. Just to humor you, I did check some of the website (even though it is completely unrelated to us). While some of their content is assuming and generalized, they did seem to exhibit knowledge on Descendants in my opinion. You have to keep in mind that it is a website based on tropes and they characterize accordingly. I didn’t see anything wrong with Jane’s page. While they mentioned her insecure personality and her cruelty towards Mal (which is her fault imo), they did also mention that she was becoming more outgoing.

I understand if you have a problem with that site, but it is what it is. If you still want to debate with others to about this issue, I advise discussing it on a discussions post or somewhere else, since it is unrelated to the thread. Let's add even more off-top, shall we? So..this person dropped in here his off-top question. Ok, fine, everyone have their questions and sometimes it happen to drop them in random locations. Good to see that he undrstands that. Great that he managed to read Vix's reply. But why deleting his own message now? Why making it even more complicated for those who maybe will read this topic later and could be confused by Red's rant about no-clue-what out of nowher. Vix saves the day though with her decision to quote it all. Yay. But..srsly, if you dropped your message where it should not be, delete it when no one answered yet. Not when it started a new conversation. It's not like anyone is going to bite your head off for making a small misstep. I'm just here for the quote chain. You can't sue me. I'm gonna sue you for a short answer. This is a lots-of-words quote chain. Look how hard Vix worked on her speech. How could you fail her like that? I know from all of us you are the best long-rant warrior. Show us your skills. Even though you did already. This quote chain deserves it. Make your keyboard suffer! Not to mention that you failed me with my plans to keep an obvious quote chain to look like a convo and not just a pure trolling. X'D K, fine... >.<"" The thing is that this convo has went so offtop, and both of our unwilling participants has willingly decided to retreat. Shame!! ... but also yay! I really don't know what else to add, but per request from dear brother, I am pleased to have the honour of extending this message to make it look as if it were a legit reply, with sophisticated sentences and actual arguments, backed up with verified proof and the Society of Floofs.